|
Post by Anon on Jul 21, 2012 8:00:14 GMT -5
Hi, I have gone through some of your blog entries. It seems that you are commies. I am interested in communism myself. Can you please explain your ideology clearly for me? I am undecided about it because so many people seem to hate communism.
~Rob
|
|
|
Post by anarchyunlimited on Jul 21, 2012 8:39:15 GMT -5
Everybody is special. Everybody. Everybody is a hero, a lover, a fool, a villain. Everybody. Everybody has their story to tell and everybody is equal. world system is curbing people's right and discriminating. all joys are being seized in the hands of a few. it has to be reversed and that is communism,anarchist communism.ITS JUST TO REVOLT AND BREAK THE WORLD ORDER. UNREST IS BASIC & ANARCHY IS FUTURE...
|
|
|
Post by Dawn of the Red on Jul 21, 2012 17:52:57 GMT -5
Very interesting. How do you know that anarchy is future?
|
|
|
Post by jmobby75 on Jul 28, 2012 23:23:59 GMT -5
Look I don't mean to offend anarchyunlimited, but do you ever check to see if you're right, and have evidence to back up your claims that the world system is DESIGNED to oppress? That would be great material to add to this site, an analysis of the evils of the world systems.
|
|
|
Post by anarchy unlimited on Jul 30, 2012 10:19:27 GMT -5
jmobby75- what has to checked? just see people condoning the most agonizing violations of humanity and refuse to see them living in a dystopia...even when they do care about any frivolous charade !!!! i don't know whether this systematic & intentional denial to see the truth causes sporadic development of truculence among the denied or not !!!! but its ascendance results the only possible natural and rational reaction which is anarchy ...to break the world order.. do u have any disagreement on this rather restraining the natural power of people's expression and to curb it into a power structure which naturally results in a newer form of oppression !!!
|
|
|
Post by lykanthrop on Aug 7, 2012 14:16:31 GMT -5
Hi.
Many here are Maoists. Can you tell me more about Maoism. I know a bit about Mao, but not his ideology.
|
|
|
Post by kolrobix on Aug 8, 2012 16:38:48 GMT -5
jmobby75- what has to checked? just see people condoning the most agonizing violations of humanity and refuse to see them living in a dystopia...even when they do care about any frivolous charade !!!! i don't know whether this systematic & intentional denial to see the truth causes sporadic development of truculence among the denied or not !!!! but its ascendance results the only possible natural and rational reaction which is anarchy ...to break the world order.. do u have any disagreement on this rather restraining the natural power of people's expression and to curb it into a power structure which naturally results in a newer form of oppression !!! nowhere anarchy succeeded into what it had promised. it is an allusion to the illusion of the petty bourgeoisie romantic dream that by only annihilating the world order, chaos will regain its natural order. oh yes you may disavow the charade..but the real turbulence maker is unheeded to your ramblings. only the one who can analyze the history's dialectics can bring forth the change, not the sporadic jerks which you think can break the shackles.
|
|
|
Post by Kranti on Aug 13, 2012 4:43:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iexist on Aug 23, 2012 7:49:45 GMT -5
jmobby75- what has to checked? just see people condoning the most agonizing violations of humanity and refuse to see them living in a dystopia...even when they do care about any frivolous charade !!!! i don't know whether this systematic & intentional denial to see the truth causes sporadic development of truculence among the denied or not !!!! but its ascendance results the only possible natural and rational reaction which is anarchy ...to break the world order.. do u have any disagreement on this rather restraining the natural power of people's expression and to curb it into a power structure which naturally results in a newer form of oppression !!! nowhere anarchy succeeded into what it had promised. it is an allusion to the illusion of the petty bourgeoisie romantic dream that by only annihilating the world order, chaos will regain its natural order. oh yes you may disavow the charade..but the real turbulence maker is unheeded to your ramblings. only the one who can analyze the history's dialectics can bring forth the change, not the sporadic jerks which you think can break the shackles. Because the collapse of the USSR and China going capitalist are such great arguments for Marxist-Leninism. Revolution isn't the workers rising to destroy the old system, it is the creation of anti capitalist spaces that expand until the replace capitalism. Look at occupy, its a microcosm of anarchist society. Your organization is an expression of the world you will create. A party with a top down structure will create a top down society.
|
|
|
Post by Kranti on Aug 23, 2012 11:01:33 GMT -5
The fall of socialism in USSR and PRC say no more than the inability of Marxism-Leninism, as it then stood, to maintain socialism beyond a few decades. However, the temporary existence of socialism in those countries also confirms Marxism-Leninism as the most successful line of thought among those that offer liberation from capitalism.
If the anti-capitalist spaces are successful in sustaining themselves and attracting the masses, then capitalism will invariably try to destroy them violently. So, in retaliation the masses have to destroy capitalism in a similar manner. Occupy has not been attacked with full force of the state because it does not pose much threat to capitalism, and has already weakened.
|
|
|
Post by basilisk on Sept 10, 2012 9:15:29 GMT -5
Marxism is a science of dynamics which drives the society. It tells us about the zenith and nadir of human progress through dialectical materialism. Hence the proof does not always lies in the longevity of the periods of socialism that had been retained in countries. The orientation , the solution, the vision of present day world crisis ,if supplied by Marx Lenin Mao thought , is useful then it is success.
|
|